California DMV registration

The scuffle on upping truck weight limit to 91,000 pounds: TCA comes out in opposition, Werner sees mixed benefit

trucks on highwayA Congressional move to allow 91,000-pound trucks on U.S. highways would do more to hurt the trucking industry’s productivity than help it, says the Truckload Carriers Association, who recently penned a letter to Rep. Reid Ribble regarding his recently proposed legislation to give states the option to allow heavier trucks within their borders.

The SAFE Trucking Act, as Ribble named his bill, would carry with it expensive trailer retorfitting costs, more expensive tractors and trailers, lower fuel economy and higher maintenance spending, TCA writes in its letter. “While this provision attempts to improve trucking productivity on our highways, it clearly would only benefit a minority of the industry,” TCA writes in its letter, which is signed by the Chairman Keith Tuttle and policy committee chair Jim Towery.

Related

Mailbag: ‘All about the money’? — Reader views on increasing truck weight

A sizable majority of Overdrive readers (64 percent) see negative primary consequences of any significant rise in interstate truck weight limits. Find a bevy of ...

When examining the costs of retrofitting trucks and trailers with an extra axle and other equipment to run 91,000 pounds, equipment upgrades could cost up to $25,000 per tractor-trailer, TCA writes, which would “yield little to no return” for a large majority of U.S. carriers. Carriers likely wouldn’t see rate increases with 91,000-pound loads, TCA says in its letter, but all carriers would face “market pressure” to equip their entire fleets with the necessary upgrades to haul heavier loads.

“TCA urges you to reconsider this proposal and find a freight productivity solution that will help to support all segments of an industry that has proven to be the backbone of the U.S. economy,” TCA says.

Likewise, Werner COO Derek Leathers, speaking at FTR’s annual Transportation Conference earlier this month, echoed TCA’s sentiment, saying even at a giant fleet like Werner, having the ability to haul 91,000-pound loads would only benefit 25 percent of the carrier’s loads.

“If I add a third axle, my mpg gets worse, my maintenance costs go up,” he said. “Negative things happen to three-quarters of my customer base [to benefit] the other quarter. You can’t make a customer argument for it, and you can’t make an economic argument for it.”

Ribble, however, when introducing the legislation, said increasing weight limits in the U.S. would reduce congestion, boost highway safety and help U.S. freight transportation be more efficient.

DOT: Little data exists to make sound decision on truck size and weight changes

The DOT on Friday issued a report saying it does not have enough data about truck size and weight to be able to make recommendations ...

The American Trucking Associations generally supports increased size and weight limits too.

Also, speaking last month at the Commercial Vehicle Outlook seminar in Dallas last month, professor John Woodruffe said the U.S.’s limits on truck size and weight put it at a disadvantage globally and cost the industry and the economy about $16 billion a year in congestion, decreased efficiency and greater greenhouse gas emissions.

The Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association has also said it opposes the bill.


from Overdrive http://ift.tt/1GdaZca

CA Vehicle registration service


Sourced by Quik DMV - CADMV fleet registration services. Renew your registration online in only 10 minutes. No DMV visits, no lines, no phone mazes, and no appointments needed. Visit Quik, Click, Pay & Print your registration from home or any local print shop.
SHARE

About Unknown

    Blogger Comment
    Facebook Comment

0 comments:

Post a Comment

-

Copyright © 2012 · Designed by studiopress · Converted by blogtipsntricks
Powered by Blogger.