California DMV registration

Lives matter, regardless of who’s a fan

No "broad societal interests" to see here. Move along.

No “broad societal interests” to see here. Move along.

Hey guess what? Turns out, trucker’s lives don’t matter. At least that’s how the courts feel in Ontario.

For those of you who are unaware, there’s a speed limiter law in Ontario that says all commercial trucks have to be governed at 65 mph, and for several years this law has been the subject of debate within the Ontario courts, specifically in the case of Gene Michaud, who was given a ticket in 2009 for having his truck governed at 68, instead of at or below 65.

Not once, but twice, this case has been found in favor of Michaud, who appealed based on his belief that 65 was arbitrary, and his limiter at 68 was still well below the flow of traffic. In 2012, an Ontario traffic court judge declared that the provincial (speed limiter) law harmed his ability to operate safely, and tossed the case. That wasn’t good enough for the province. Even though Michaud was ill and near death by this time, they appealed the case, and after Michaud’s death, they allowed his widow to stand proxy for the outcome.

The Ontario Court of Appeals (think Supreme Court in the US) found that Section 7 (of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms) was violated (by the limiter law) and puts the truck driver in a dangerous situation.

Sounds like a win, right? But no. Wait for it….

In the same turn, the court allowed the original law to stand, citing that “a law can stand and be considered constitutional if it shows and justifies a broad societal interest.”

Wait a minute. What?

Related

‘Huge mistake': Readers sound off on speed limiters

In this Overdrive Radio podcast, voices are raised against any speed limiter mandate, while some emphasize alternatives to imposing a single speed on on-highway trucks, ...

So two courts have determined this law is dangerous to the trucker, and yet it’s OK, because the truckers don’t represent a “broad societal interest?”

Apparently, Ontario isn’t aware of how this works. If the people who bring you literally every single thing you eat, drink, wear, sit on, lay on and pee in don’t represent a “broad societal interest” then I’m afraid no one does. The stark stupidity of the statement alone is terrifying.

Related

Societal benefits of speed limiters outweigh trucker safety, Canadian court rules

“The public benefits associated with improved highway safety exceed the detrimental effects on the truck drivers," a Canadian judge wrote in the court's majority opinion. ...

Trucker lives matter. Hell, ALL lives matter – this isn’t a “pick and choose” kind of statement, but when a high court determines it’s OK for truckers to die because of flawed “safety” regulations, it’s not for the better good, or even acceptable collateral damage. It’s because they won’t admit they’re wrong, and like evil pre-schoolers, they will pitch temper tantrums all over hell and creation to avoid admitting they’re wrong. Meanwhile, people (truckers) die.

Way to go, Ontario. Thanks for pointing out yet another place we will never bring our truck.

Produce haulers looking for another reason not to go to California…

Look no further than recent "hot market maps" showing reefer load-to-truck from DAT ... And: rates were in positive territory last week -- Roadcheck effect, ...


from Overdrive http://ift.tt/1JTA3pe

CA Vehicle registration service


Sourced by Quik DMV - CADMV fleet registration services. Renew your registration online in only 10 minutes. No DMV visits, no lines, no phone mazes, and no appointments needed. Visit Quik, Click, Pay & Print your registration from home or any local print shop.
SHARE

About Unknown

    Blogger Comment
    Facebook Comment

0 comments:

Post a Comment

-

Copyright © 2012 · Designed by studiopress · Converted by blogtipsntricks
Powered by Blogger.